<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If you pay your visitors’ salaries, then it pays to optimize</title>
	<atom:link href="http://showmeanalytics.com/2008/12/if-you-pay-your-visitors%e2%80%99-salaries-then-it-pays-to-optimize/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://showmeanalytics.com/2008/12/if-you-pay-your-visitors%e2%80%99-salaries-then-it-pays-to-optimize/</link>
	<description>Analytics from the Show Me State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 07:48:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: angie</title>
		<link>http://showmeanalytics.com/2008/12/if-you-pay-your-visitors%e2%80%99-salaries-then-it-pays-to-optimize/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showmeanalytics.com/?p=5#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Are any of those tasks identifiable by URL? If so, then no additional tagging would be needed... you can set up &quot;goals&quot; or &quot;conversions&quot; based on the URL. Content groups can also be used to pull together similar activities (e.g. all the URLs that match pattern X represent proposal downloads, URLs match pattern Y represent a client find in CRM) for easier tracking.

I&#039;ve got one content site for which I&#039;m using logfiles (no tagging at all), and I&#039;m able to track success metrics in that manner pretty well. Even if there isn&#039;t a &quot;thank you&quot; page for every transaction, you can pick the URL that&#039;s furthest along in the process so you have something to look at. It&#039;s not perfect, but you can often still get some valuable insights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are any of those tasks identifiable by URL? If so, then no additional tagging would be needed&#8230; you can set up &#8220;goals&#8221; or &#8220;conversions&#8221; based on the URL. Content groups can also be used to pull together similar activities (e.g. all the URLs that match pattern X represent proposal downloads, URLs match pattern Y represent a client find in CRM) for easier tracking.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got one content site for which I&#8217;m using logfiles (no tagging at all), and I&#8217;m able to track success metrics in that manner pretty well. Even if there isn&#8217;t a &#8220;thank you&#8221; page for every transaction, you can pick the URL that&#8217;s furthest along in the process so you have something to look at. It&#8217;s not perfect, but you can often still get some valuable insights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter German</title>
		<link>http://showmeanalytics.com/2008/12/if-you-pay-your-visitors%e2%80%99-salaries-then-it-pays-to-optimize/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter German</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://showmeanalytics.com/?p=5#comment-39</guid>
		<description>In my ideal world, I would love to be able to track end tasks that have been completed by users. 

It would provide an understanding of what tasks people are completing in their usage. I would love to be able to say:

In the month of February, our portal serviced:
-3809 requests for payroll information
-202 proposal were downloaded
-312 new client were found from our CRM
-etc.

IMHO keeping track of these behaviors relates more specifically to a portal&#039;s value.

Unfortunately to do so, our portal would require extensive tagging, which is not a high priority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my ideal world, I would love to be able to track end tasks that have been completed by users. </p>
<p>It would provide an understanding of what tasks people are completing in their usage. I would love to be able to say:</p>
<p>In the month of February, our portal serviced:<br />
-3809 requests for payroll information<br />
-202 proposal were downloaded<br />
-312 new client were found from our CRM<br />
-etc.</p>
<p>IMHO keeping track of these behaviors relates more specifically to a portal&#8217;s value.</p>
<p>Unfortunately to do so, our portal would require extensive tagging, which is not a high priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
